Background: During sepsis, heart rate (HR) reduction could be a therapeutic target, but identification of responders (non-compensatory tachycardia) and non-responders (compensatory for ‘fixed’ stroke volume [SV]) is challenging. We tested the ability of the difference between systolic and dicrotic pressure (SDPdifference), which reflects the coupling between myocardial contractility and a given afterload, in discriminating the origin of tachycardia. Methods: In this post hoc analysis of 45 patients with septic shock with persistent tachycardia, we characterised features of haemodynamic response focusing on SDPdifference, classifying patients according to variations in arterial dP/dtmax after 4 h of esmolol administration to maintain HR <95 beats min−1. A cut-off value of 0.9 mm Hg ms−1 was used for group allocation. Results: After reducing HR, arterial dP/dtmax remained above the cut-off in 23 patients, whereas it decreased below the cut-off in 22 patients (from 0.99 [0.37] to 0.63 [0.16] mm Hg ms−1; mean [SD], P<0.001). At baseline, patients with decreased dP/dtmax after esmolol had lower SDPdifference than those with higher dP/dtmax (40 [19] vs 53 [16] mm Hg, respectively; P=0.01). The SDPdifference remained unchanged after esmolol in the higher dP/dtmax group (49 [16] mm Hg), whereas it decreased significantly in patients with lower dP/dtmax (29 [11] mm Hg; P<0.001). In the latter, the HR reduction resulted in a significant cardiac output reduction with unchanged SV, whereas in patients with higher dP/dtmax SV increased (from 48 [12] to 67 [14] ml; P<0.001) with maintained cardiac output. Conclusions: A decrease in SDPdifference could discriminate between compensatory and non-compensatory tachycardia, revealing a covert loss of myocardial contractility not detected by conventional echocardiographic parameters and deteriorating after HR reduction with esmolol. Clinical trial registration: NCT02188888.

Systolic-dicrotic notch pressure difference can identify tachycardic patients with septic shock at risk of cardiovascular decompensation following pharmacological heart rate reduction / Morelli, A.; Romano, S. M.; Sanfilippo, F.; Santonocito, C.; Frati, G.; Chiostri, M.; Agro, F. E.; Ertmer, C.; Rehberg, S. W.; Vieillard-Baron, A.. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA. - ISSN 0007-0912. - 125:6(2020), pp. 1018-1024. [10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.058]

Systolic-dicrotic notch pressure difference can identify tachycardic patients with septic shock at risk of cardiovascular decompensation following pharmacological heart rate reduction

Morelli A.;Frati G.;
2020

Abstract

Background: During sepsis, heart rate (HR) reduction could be a therapeutic target, but identification of responders (non-compensatory tachycardia) and non-responders (compensatory for ‘fixed’ stroke volume [SV]) is challenging. We tested the ability of the difference between systolic and dicrotic pressure (SDPdifference), which reflects the coupling between myocardial contractility and a given afterload, in discriminating the origin of tachycardia. Methods: In this post hoc analysis of 45 patients with septic shock with persistent tachycardia, we characterised features of haemodynamic response focusing on SDPdifference, classifying patients according to variations in arterial dP/dtmax after 4 h of esmolol administration to maintain HR <95 beats min−1. A cut-off value of 0.9 mm Hg ms−1 was used for group allocation. Results: After reducing HR, arterial dP/dtmax remained above the cut-off in 23 patients, whereas it decreased below the cut-off in 22 patients (from 0.99 [0.37] to 0.63 [0.16] mm Hg ms−1; mean [SD], P<0.001). At baseline, patients with decreased dP/dtmax after esmolol had lower SDPdifference than those with higher dP/dtmax (40 [19] vs 53 [16] mm Hg, respectively; P=0.01). The SDPdifference remained unchanged after esmolol in the higher dP/dtmax group (49 [16] mm Hg), whereas it decreased significantly in patients with lower dP/dtmax (29 [11] mm Hg; P<0.001). In the latter, the HR reduction resulted in a significant cardiac output reduction with unchanged SV, whereas in patients with higher dP/dtmax SV increased (from 48 [12] to 67 [14] ml; P<0.001) with maintained cardiac output. Conclusions: A decrease in SDPdifference could discriminate between compensatory and non-compensatory tachycardia, revealing a covert loss of myocardial contractility not detected by conventional echocardiographic parameters and deteriorating after HR reduction with esmolol. Clinical trial registration: NCT02188888.
2020
arterial elastance; beta blockers; dicrotic notch; esmolol; haemodynamic monitoring; septic shock; tachycardia; ventricular–arterial coupling; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Arterial Pressure; Blood Pressure; Cardiac Output; Echocardiography; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Contraction; Norepinephrine; Propanolamines; Prospective Studies; Shock, Septic; Tachycardia; Vasoconstrictor Agents
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Systolic-dicrotic notch pressure difference can identify tachycardic patients with septic shock at risk of cardiovascular decompensation following pharmacological heart rate reduction / Morelli, A.; Romano, S. M.; Sanfilippo, F.; Santonocito, C.; Frati, G.; Chiostri, M.; Agro, F. E.; Ertmer, C.; Rehberg, S. W.; Vieillard-Baron, A.. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA. - ISSN 0007-0912. - 125:6(2020), pp. 1018-1024. [10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.058]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Morelli_Systolic-dicrotic_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 300.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
300.88 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1473062
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact